Connect with us

News

My Blood Taken More Than 21 Times – Nnamdi Kanu Reveals As He Sues DSS, AGF

Published

on

My Blood Taken More Than 21 Times - Nnamdi Kanu Reveals As He Sues DSS, AGF

IPOB leader,  Nnamdi Kanu has revealed that his blood has been taken more than 21 times in detention as he sues DSS and AGF over poor medical attention. 

Infoexpert24 eports that the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu has dragged the Department of State Service, DSS, before the Federal High Court in Abuja, accusing it of grossly violating his fundamental human rights.

The IPOB Leader, Monday, in the suit he filed through one of his lawyers, Mr. Maxwell Opara, alleged that a doctor engaged by the security agency, has extracted his blood over 21 times.

Nnamdi Kanu bemoaned that despite an order of the court, he has neither been allowed to have a change of clothing nor to practice his religion in detention.

Advertisement

Cited as Respondents in the suit markedly FHC/ABJ/CS/1585/21, are the Director-General of the DSS, the DSS, and the Attorney-General of the Federation.

My Blood Taken More Than 21 Times - Nnamdi Kanu Reveals As He Sues DSS, AGF

Nnamdi Kanu

The suit was supported by an affidavit of urgency that was deposed to by Kanu’s younger brother, Emmanuel.

Briefing newsmen shortly after he filed the suit, Opara, said when he visited the DSS detention facility last Thursday, the IPOB leader, complained to him that he suspected the doctor extracting his blood to be a quack.

He said that Kanu alleged that his demand for the security agency to grant him access to his medical record, was repeatedly refused.

Advertisement

The affidavit in support of the suit, a copy of which was sighted by Vanguard, read in part: “The Applicant is a Nigerian citizen who is entitled to the enjoyment of the fundamental rights enshrined in chapter 4 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended and Article 5 and 8 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act Cap A9 Vol. 1 LFN.

“The Respondents have deprived the Applicant access to facility and material to practice his faith and ultimately prevented the Applicant from praying and/or practicing his faith, and the aforesaid constitute a breach of the Applicant’s right to practice his religion.

“The Respondents prevented the Applicant from having access to a medical practitioner and legal practitioner of his choice.

Advertisement

“An order of this court directing the Respondents to immediately remove the Applicant from solitary confinement.

As well as, “An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Respondents, their authorized agents by whatever name so-called, from further disturbing or interfering with the rights of the Applicant to the dignity of the human person and freedom thought, conscience and religion or in any way infringing on the constitutional rights of the Applicant as guaranteed by law or from making any attempt capable of violating the Applicant’s rights as guaranteed under the Constitution”.

Facebook Comments
Advertisement